I did a triple-take, groggy from the night before. Up to that point, I’d been sleepwalking, reluctant to embark on my paper route, but in three blinks, a crisis! Thousands of magazines. Thousands of dollars. They were all gone!

The concrete floor of the 5x10ft caged area was completely bare. I stepped into the space, thinking I was hallucinating and that any moment I’d trip over the stacks, but no.

Someone at the complex must have cleaned the thing out by mistake!

I rushed from the storage area to the office, panicked, cursing, pissed. Admittedly, it was nice to feel alive that morning though. A punch in the nose! A splash of bright red in a world gone dark. As an old teacher of mine used to say, I like the action.

Once in the office, I assumed the posture of a wronged but dignified American–a stern but reconcilable customer, confident he would be made whole because he was worth it.

I crossed my arms. I puffered my fish. “Yes, I know it’s not your fault, but it’s absolutely crucial I speak to someone in management today. This is an emergency.”

I added “CEO” to the signature of my emails as I fired them off to upper staff. Calls were made, Saturday calls, which would test and confirm the limits of my perceived value as a resident and citizen. There was no response.

The next day, getting desperate, our entire inventory plundered, I dug around for cell numbers. I can get anyone’s cell number, I like to say.

I called a number associated with the name of the leasing agent who’d given me a deal on the storage unit. A Sunday call. Another test of my power.

“Hello?” a voice answered drowsily on the other end.

“Hi, —, this is Paul French in Unit —. I was wondering if you’d been getting my emails.”

“About what?”

“About the inventory taken from my storage unit.”

“Oh fuck you.”

He hung up.

For a second, I was on the verge of becoming a victimized and angry American customer, truly an ugly sight, but I realized the voice on the other end had sounded nothing like my guy, who has one of those clear, bourbony baritones, like our radio host Anthony Elio. I found out there was a local lawyer with the same name, and “fuck you” must have been his way of saying “wrong number.” What kind of fish was he?

I filed the police report and told our creative director Shane what happened. We began puzzling through the case. The apartment complex was still suspect #1, but, if not them, could it really have been theft? Who steals roughly 4,000 magazines, and why?

The issues were in strapped bundles, so it wasn’t as if the person taking them was playing some mystery box game. Also, as I’ve mentioned before, paper is heavy! When we pick up the magazines from the printer, we usually have at least three people and three vehicles helping. I almost totaled my truck, in fact, when I let one of the dock guys load an entire pallet (over 3,500lbs) into the bed (it sank the whole thing almost flush with the wheels). All of that loading and unloading, of course, takes a long time. This would have been quite an operation.

By this point, we’d already circulated most of the copies of the spring issue to subscribers and participating businesses, so it wasn’t the full 10,000 we print–just the 4,000 remaining. But that’s still a ton of magazines (literally), enough to take at least half an hour or so to porter to a necessarily heavy-duty vehicle.

All this to say, whoever took the magazines had to do so very intentionally.

I began questioning my original theory of the apartment complex, as who in their right mind would commit such an undertaking without sending an email? Stranger things have happened, but still.

Shane and I theorized some options in order of likelihood. It was either:

1. A mistake by the apartment complex’s storage team. Likely: because it was the simplest answer. Unlikely: because of the effort involved and (one would hope) communication protocols preventing staff from throwing away residents’ belongings en masse by mistake.

2. Attempted sabotage by a competitor. Likely? Well, not really at all, I would think. Media can be a petty and smarmy business. Even so, it would be a massive reputational risk for some competitor to do something like this, and what would they even gain? We can print more magazines. Yes, it’s a hit, but unless they knew that we were one theft away from being irrevocably destroyed, it would be a bad idea to try to burgle us. Also, they would have to know where I live, where I stored the magazines, etc. Finally, for all of the self-deprecating trash talk I spit at the media, I do think many of us are conscientious folk, who at least want to believe we’re doing the right thing.

3. Attempted sabotage by a slighted article subject. Likely? Also no, for many of the same reasons above. It’s a lot of trouble to do something like this. And besides, we’re not really a gossip rag. Most of the critical views our writers have leveled at people, places, things are usually tempered with an exploration of the other side (ours being a more longform journalistic enterprise, and not exactly packed with editorial hot takes on issues). I’m sure someone’s been irritated by something one of our writers penned (that’s just unavoidable), but you’d have to have quite an axe to grind to commit this kind of theft, and, again, it’s so high-risk! When I talked to Patty Calhoun over at Westword about this (longtime supporter/advisor, by the way; she’s the real deal), she said she was aware of cases like this sparked by miffed subjects. However, being a regular reader, she admitted that she hadn’t seen anything in our publication that would arouse such contempt.

4. Pure theft. Likely? Not at all, unless the thief was either a complete moron or insane. Unless you can sell the magazines through a website or other means (which you couldn’t do without getting caught pretty quickly), there’s no way you could get any value from these copies. It’s not as if there’s a robust black market for print publications out there. I’ve seen people selling stray copies of past issues on Ebay (and I really don’t care about that; it’s quite flattering), but there’s no way you can just sell 4,000 copies of Denverse on the street (if you can, please send notes).

My mind was still set on option 1. After two days, the management at my apartment complex finally got back to me. I had a sit-down meeting with them. They weren’t the culprit, they stressed, adamantly after lots of grilling. Nobody on staff had removed anything from the storage containers, and, as I imagined, there was a rigid protocol about removing items from the units. It was theft, they said. The only question was whether the cameras at the facility had caught a glimpse of the perps.

I waited for word from the Denver Police. There was none. I waited for information from the surveillance company contracted by the apartment. After a week, they sent a curt email saying that, despite multiple cameras being nearby, there were no visuals. Since this was patently absurd (no way someone could have gotten all of those magazines out of there without being on camera), I tried pestering the police to see if they could request the footage. I received a reply saying that our case had been marked inactive. When I asked why it had been labeled inactive, the police told me that they needed information from me. And when I asked what information they needed from me, they requested much of the information I had sent in my original report. I sent the info again, along with some paperwork from the recent purchase we’d made to reprint the magazines we lost. Then I waited again.

Finally, someone from the district (without providing a name) said they were reaching out to the apartment manager, but that they were on vacation…

And, alas, Dear Reader, that is where things sit at the moment. Hopefully, the footage can be retrieved and will reveal something about the perps. I’ll keep you updated if anything interesting happens.

Naturally, I was tempted to use this case as fodder for our next print edition. However, I don’t think lingering on this woebegone topic is good for us, and I have other interests I want to pursue for the next edition. We’ve got to press forward.

That could change if the case gets interesting though, of course. We’ll just have to see. I’m very grateful for all the interest this caper has brought us though. Not exactly free press, but I’ll take it! Subscription rates are looking great! Not nearly enough to compensate for the loss as yet, but, hey, that’s business. I have no doubt that if we stick to the fundamentals and keep putting out great work from talented locals, we’ll make up for it in the long run.

As always, thanks for being part of this adventure in independent media. It’s fascinating, personally, seeing how tricky this entire enterprise is. But so far, so good. And, if our print pirate is reading this, you should know there’s a song in our hearts:

Yours,

Paul M. French, editor

A historic fad fades away, only to be resurrected by the underground

At first glance, Denver might seem a million miles from the tropical beaches of Polynesia, both geographically and culturally, but the Mile High City has a surprisingly rich history of tiki bars dating back to the 1950s. Our introduction to tiki is all thanks to two titans of the tropical cocktail named Donn Beach and Trader Vic Bergeron, who birthed a craze that swept across midcentury America before succumbing to the merciless fate of all fads.

However, this is a tale of redemption. Tiki culture rose from the ashes, and the scene today overlaps many other underground subcultures, including old-school punk, burlesque, hot rods, pinups, goth and rockabilly. Tiki’s aesthetics challenge the notions of high- and low-brow culture by elevating what bourgeois tastemakers dismiss as kitschy, gaudy, and polarizing.

–– • ––

The word “tiki” is derived from Māori creation mythology. Like biblical Adam, Tiki was…

Read more

I do my own bit of skidding into some miraculous metered parking on Lincoln, and soon I’m rushing toward the kids like a lunatic, shouting, “Hey, hi, sorry! Can I talk to you?”

The girl is the first to answer. She shoots me a hard look, her tone cold and bureaucratic. She probably thinks I’m trying to bust up their fun. “What is it you’re wanting?” she asks. I tell her I’m working on a magazine story, which doesn’t do much to soften…

Read more

These are just a handful of local events organized by the Sapphic Social Club (at Fort Greene); the Mile High Queer Club (feat. the Center on Colfax, at Town Hall Collaborative); the Sapphic Collective; the Queer Creative Writers club; the Fruity Film club; and The Pearl.

I could use up almost all of the space in this entire article just listing publicly queer businesses in the Denver area (Petals and Pages bookstore, Lady Justice Brewing, Goldspot Brewing, the 99ers Sports Bar, Rainbow Dome, Queer Joy Photography, Queer Asterisk Psychotherapy, the Lesbian Couples Institute), as well as peripatetic…

Read more

It’s Monday evening and I’m parked illegally on Colfax, walking through cones and rubble with a heavy bundle of paper in each hand—what gym rats call a farmer’s carry. In theory, publishing this magazine would be a glamorous enterprise. In reality, it’s a paper route at age 37. Being a small business owner, as folks along this street will tell you, is a humbling experience.

I step inside The Learned Lemur, an oddities shop where there’s a full zebra skeleton on display for $15,000, but also, today, the mayor. Since the Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Project started tearing up the street, Mike Johnston has been on a public relations tour, popping into shops and restaurants to mix with owners and patrons—even serving up drinks at spots like The 99ers Sports Bar.

It’s all part of a campaign to drum up business along the Colfax corridor while the street is tilled by a massive construction project tabbed at $280 million. It also appears to be an attempt by Johnston to reassure the community that th…

Read more

I think the war is already lost. I think we’re doomed. Let’s… Let’s win a few battles along the way.”

I listen as Todd Madison, 11-12th grade English teacher at East High School, utters a swan song for his profession.

“We always hear about those Japanese soldiers after World War II who kept fighting for years or even decades, not knowing it’s over. And that’s what I feel about myself right now,” he says. “The war’s already over, but I’m going to keep fighting while I can… have a few victories.”

Meanwhile, right down the hall from Madison, fellow teacher Jason Sternberg sings a different tune. “I call it my friend Chad,” he says, referring to ChatGPT. He elaborates that, while he’s opposed to students using these tools for significant assignments, he’s more optimistic about AI in the classroom. In fact, he’s quite open about employing the technology himself. “I can just be like, ‘Hey, can you take this information and put it into a handout for a kid?’” he says. “Then I look over it, make sure that everything is legit, because I definitely recognize the limitations and the fact that it could make things up. But I just find it to be a tool for convenience.”

Madison and Sternberg represent a broader division on AI in education. The technology’s introduction—or imposition, depending on your view—has led to a Wild West scenario where rules and philosophies diverge dramatically from classroom to classroom. And as educators wrestle with the new reality, lines are being drawn, with neither side certain of what’s to come and students caught in the middle.

“I don’t think the administration knows what to do,” reported K, a senior at the Denver School for the Arts. “And I honestly think that has backed them into a corner, because I don’t think they can talk about it.”

K explained that, during their sophomore year, teachers and administrators took more of a hardline approach to AI. “There was a no-tolerance policy,” K said. “If you were caught using AI, it would be an automatic zero, things like that. But since then, things have softened, and I think it’s because teachers can’t really do anything about it. I was talking to my film studies teacher last year, and he said that he knows a lot of the work is written by AI, but that it’s just too out of hand.”

Interviews with other students and teachers in Denver confirmed K’s account. At the beginning, AI-assisted homework was treated like plagiarism. After all, a student using AI is passing someone else’s work for their own—even if that “someone” isn’t a someone in the traditional sense.

Read more

The leasing professional (let’s call her M) had decided to be honest with me. We were sitting in the offices of one of Denver’s many new luxury apartment complexes—“luxury” a byword of the real estate world as meaningless as “premier” or “premium.” But it looked nice enough. Stainless steel fixtures and cream-white walls. I imagined turning the knobs of a kitchen faucet and unleashing a fat high-pressure stream instead of the sad, spindly dribble I was used to.

But beyond the amenities, M lamented, the place was cheap in the ways that mattered. “Whenever the people upstairs walk from their bed to the living room, I can hear every step,” she said.

She started venting about the market, explaining how some developers and contractors would cut corners in build quality, or rely on cheap, shortsighted gimmicks to attract tenants. There were complexes with built-in bars and clubs with rotating DJs—part of a movement to create a 24/7 party atmosphere in the place where you were supposed to rest your head, with varying degrees of success.

The prime example was X Denver—a complex opened in 2021 in the Union Station neighborhood west of Coors Field. Originally outfitted with a built-in restaurant, a large gym, a bar, workspaces, and a yoga studio, X Denver was marketed as a social paradise for young, attractive tenants who wanted to live the high life downtown, even if they had to be packed into co-occupied living spaces, with four or more residents sharing a single living room and kitchen. When I visited the complex to see the experiment myself, a different leasing pro (let’s call him K) gave me a tour and informed me that the experience was similar to living in a dorm.

“I think there was a bunch of trust fund kids drunk at dinner who thought of this,” K said, as we entered the complex’s abandoned dining area. It turned out that operating a full-service restaurant on the 12th floor of an apartment complex was a difficult enterprise. No longer serving meals, the space had been converted to yet another workspace. It was completely empty—like the pool area, also on the 12th floor.

K guided me outside. The bar by the pool was closed, as was the pool itself, under maintenance, K said. The vacant cement deck radiated with afternoon heat, and it was dead quiet as I looked around the giant slab, trying to imagine the party.

“That looks a little treacherous,” I said, gesturing to a sheer edge by the pool area—a sudden drop, with decorative concrete tiers and hard edges below. No railing.

“Super treacherous,” said K. “I think they were building this during COVID, and they maybe weren’t getting those same regulators coming through. I’m not exactly sure, but I totally agree.”

Fortunately, nobody was out poolside getting tipsy. As K and I took the elevator down, I wondered how someone could live in this building and call it home.

“You have no idea what’s coming down the pike,” M told me in her office, citing a new complex down in Phoenix—an entire building themed after the Mario Kart franchise. Developers, it seemed, were going to extreme ends to attract qualified tenants.

“But who would live in places like that?” I asked. “I can see someone in their early twenties maybe living there for a year or two as a goof, but you’re not going to stay long-term.”

“Places like that don’t care about you being there long-term,” she said. “If you move out after a year or two, it gives them a chance to hike up rents on the next person.”

Read more

The voice on the line shocks me. For weeks, I’d been tracking down the person responsible for a message I couldn’t escape. I saw it in Baker. I saw it in Cap Hill. Behind a high fence rolled with razor wire, in the upper part of RiNo where the mural-rich neighborhood relapses into grit, there it was: OHURT.

A message. But also a name, a persona. Self-promotion is rampant in graffiti culture. The more your name is “up,” the better. As I’m later told, “It’s like marketing without a college degree.” Graffiti artists compete for wall space the same way corporate brands muscle for airtime—one of these isn’t trying to sell you something, and that’s the one that’s illegal.

So when I started exchanging messages with Ohurt, it was a criminal I pictured—an image my mind and the world’s penal systems mostly code as male. But speaking to me late at night, from a blocked number, is the bright voice of a young woman. She laughs at my confusion and agrees to let me tag along.

A month later, Ohurt and her husband pick me up in an SUV en route to zones of vandalism. It’s about midnight, and I’m wearing dark clothes, as instructed. The weeds in the planters outside my complex bend with late winter gusts. I feel the chill enter my fingers and worry I didn’t layer properly, as instructed.

“Are you excited?” Ohurt’s husband asks me from the driver’s seat. The whole sequence makes me feel like a kid. In Ohurt’s world, that’s what I am though—despite her being about a decade my junior.

Ohurt is in her mid-twenties, and there’s absolutely nothing about her appearance that strikes me as tough. As she turns her head, I notice a bow in her hair, white ribbons falling down her back—ostentatiously girlish, the kind of thing you’d see a fourth grader wear on a field trip to the state fair.

“Yeah, I’ve never done anything like this before,” I admit.

We joke a bit about the risks of journalism. The SUV and the good humor of my subjects put me at ease, but I’d sent screenshots of my interactions with Ohurt to a close friend before heading out, just in case. “Writing is a contact sport,” Ohurt’s husband had said after joining us on that first phone call. In this context, “writing” meant graffiti, with artists referring to themselves as “writers.” By “contact sport,” he meant that violence is always a possibility.

We’re heading south on Broadway, on our way to fix a diss. A local crew (a band of graffiti artists) has been messing with Ohurt’s tags, sometimes crossing her name out, sometimes writing their handle over hers. Despite its illicit nature, graffiti is rife with protocol. It even appears to have its own class system. If someone has already tagged a spot, especially if the artist is established—and not a “toy,” a derogatory term for graffiti newbies and dilettantes—it’s considered an insult to tamper with their art.

In this case, a crew using the tag “KE” (short for “Kill Em All” according to Ohurt) has sabotaged Ohurt’s tags on some shipping containers off Santa Fe. KE is a bigger and more intimidating operation, Ohurt says, with dozens of people in the crew, and they’re not just claiming walls as canvas; they’re marking territory.

“A lot of writers come from gangs,” says Ohurt. “But I don’t think you have to come from a gang to do graffiti.”

Ohurt comments on how her background makes her an anomaly in the culture. First, of course, she’s a woman. While female writers do exist, Ohurt says, it’s rare that they’re involved with the riskier streetside vandalism of tagging billboards and rooftops. Second, she’s middle class. Her father is a local business owner, and she doesn’t have a criminal background beyond her current endeavors. Third, she’s an independent artist—not part of a crew. And, according to Ohurt, this is what has led to the beef with other artists in the area.

“If you get up enough, crews will ask you to get with them and throw them up so that they’re more seen,” Ohurt says, explaining that she’s declined every offer she’s received. Ohurt has been writing for about four years, but, after a skateboarding accident where she broke her arm and her jaw, her tagging routine became constant and her work began catching the attention of established crews.

Up to that point, Ohurt had been using graffiti to express inner pain—her battles with anxiety and depression. “It was definitely an outlet to feel…seen,” she says. However, with her jaw wired and her arm in a sling, Ohurt found even more reasons to turn to the streets for therapy, and her tagging accelerated to a breakneck pace. “We’d be walking probably five to ten miles a night in the summer. For like six hours. Till the sunrise sometimes,” says Ohurt.

It wasn’t long before Ohurt’s tags were everywhere, and local crews began calling on her to work with them. “It’s like a sales company hiring a really good marketing agent,” her husband explains.

However, Ohurt wanted to remain independent, and it was when she began rejecting the advances of these crews, she says, that resentment began to build and she started receiving threats online.

“There’s a lot of politics in the graffiti world. The threats are crazy. They go deep,” says Ohurt, claiming that she has received pictures of guns from taggers who think she’s edging in on their turf. Most alarming was a recent incident where a picture of her in a bikini circulated among members of a crew.

“It got scary,” Ohurt says. “Graffiti is supposed to be really anonymous. But these people got pictures of me and were sending them around.”

And while the politics and the threats haven’t stopped Ohurt from writing, they have had an impact on the way she views graffiti. “I got involved way more than I wanted to be involved,” she says. “I didn’t want to be this known, I guess. It just kind of happened. It was really compulsive for me. But I never expected to piss so many people off. It was such a joy for me and felt so special, and then when other people got involved, I just didn’t want to paint anymore.”

We pull up behind a car wash. Ohurt and her husband take a telescoping metal ladder, along with a few spray cans, out of the back of their car, and we walk up an embankment until we reach an array of derelict shipping containers. Gravel crunches beneath our shoes, mixing with the soughing of sparse late-night traffic on the road behind us.

“Have you ever encountered another person tagging while you’re out?” I ask.

“It does happen,” says Ohurt’s husband. “Most of the time people will just ask you what you write and leave you alone. One night we ran into three guys from this group called RGK, but that was really chill. But then later, as internet politics started to unfold, they reached out to us and said that if they ever saw us again, they’d take our paint, which is like a big diss. You have to fight for your paint.”

“This is people’s life,” adds Ohurt. “It means everything to them.”

“Some people are really territorial, but other people like Ohurt just want to get really good. And there’s people in Denver who have been doing this for like 50 years, and they don’t fight because they have nothing to prove. They’re just really talented,” says her husband.

After examining the diss she received from KE on the side of a shipping container, Ohurt scales her ladder and begins working on a “throw”—a more elaborate form of graffiti denoted by large bubbly lettering and often stylized to the point of illegibility. Ohurt’s husband steadies the ladder while she focuses on writing. The work is hard, especially during the colder months when the can gets icy in your hand and scaling billboards, fire escapes, and other urban features becomes more treacherous. “Those billboards wobble a lot. It’s terrifying. But it’s exhilarating, you know, Ohurt tells me.

In the graffiti world, the harder-to-reach a spot is, the more impressive tagging it becomes. Ohurt cites a throw across from the downtown Warwick Hotel as one of her favorites. “She can get anywhere. She’s so small,” says Ohurt’s husband, who will encourage his 5’ 4” wife to reach riskier spots, despite her fear of heights.

Originally bonding over skateboarding, Ohurt and her husband, who writes under the handle “Fewer,” eventually discovered a shared love of graffiti when they started dating. “We just had all the same interests, knew the same artists. So I started pushing her to get into it. Sometimes I pushed her too hard,” says Ohurt’s husband. “I had friends who’d really succeeded in the graffiti world. Not that there’s money in it. They were just very known.”

Since then, on their mission to “be seen,” the pair estimates that they’ve done over 1,000 tags throughout the city, with hundreds of throws. “Throws are harder,” says Ohurt. “It’s a lot of paint, and in Denver not every spot has longevity. All the spots are getting buffed a lot, so it makes it harder to paint or to want to paint.”

“Buffing” refers to the cleaning up of graffiti by the city or by property owners. I question Ohurt about the damage graffiti might pose to small businesses, and she explains that, among established writers, churches, schools, and small businesses are considered off-limits.

“I was out by the library, and I saw ‘Ohurt’ on a mural on the side of City O’ City,” I mention.

“That was me,” says Ohurt’s husband. “I was going over someone I didn’t like. They were already there.”

“If you’re a real writer, you won’t go out and do that stuff,” says Ohurt. “It just makes you look bad to other writers if you’re out there breaking the rules.”

“When we passed Book Mall, was that you breaking the rules?” I ask, referring to a tag the pair had pointed out earlier on the side of the Broadway bookstore’s roof.

“Not really, because it’s just on the roof and it’s small. If I had done a throw or something on the windows, writers would think it was shitty,” Ohurt replies.

“I have an interesting take on that,” Ohurt’s husband breaks in. “Hers is probably right. Like, Book Mall is cute. You’re like this liberal bookstore probably, and, like, there’s some lesbian chick working there, and I should respect that, but also they’re white, rich-ish people that have probably kicked Mexicans out of that business, or blacks out of that business, or natives out of that business or something. I think, like, fuck every business.”

“I don’t think that at all,” says Ohurt.

“It sucks because her dad owns a small business,” continues her husband. “But as a business owner, I would expect that—whether it’s a heroin needle or a tag on the side of the building.”

***

We end the night at the Evans Yard, a trainyard Ohurt and her husband describe as a legendary site for Denver graffiti, with writers coming from all over the nation to throw their name on the wall that runs beside the train tracks.

The proof is apparent. As we walk together, following the bend of cold light reflecting on the tracks, hundreds of names come into view, thousands maybe. Suddenly absorbed, Ohurt and her husband begin speaking in a private language: “There’s Hofcrew! Damn 4get just clipping Lower with the ‘G’… God, I love him. He changed the style… That’s a Voice throw! I’ve never seen a Voice throw… It’s really good. It might be from the 90s. I don’t know.”

I’m lost in the jargon, scanning the wall of names—each one a coded broadcast of a writer’s existence, a more artful “I was here” ironically inaccessible to the masses, mingling instead with other voices of the underground—communicating, competing. All of these names, all of these hours of work done in the dark at great personal risk. No profit and no popular acclaim. Just this deep need to write, to be seen. We turn around and head back to the car, but we could have kept going. The wall stretches on out of sight.

“Your relationships may not last. But this Eternal Shooting Star Idol will!” reads the text beside her giant jellied eyes. At the bottom of the graphic, Nyaruchuu’s social media handles are listed. At Broadway and 10^th, the billboard occupies prime real estate for advertising—a high-traffic intersection catching southbound commuters heading home from the metro. And, later, when I call the person responsible for coordinating the purchase, I learn it was $4,500 for the spot and that it wasn’t the first. The original billboard was up north on Walnut Street, and it was $2,000. “Alone? Good,” the previous iteration read. Both were birthday presents for the girl whose age is listed online as “Forever 18.”

I have no idea what I’m about to get into. I scroll through Nyaruchuu’s Twitter page and fi…

Read more

On the last day of May, a crowd huddled in the basement of a strip mall on Denver’s west side. In front of them was the Dem Deya Sound System, arrayed against the back wall of the basement’s innermost room and split by a flickering DJ console. The speakers were quiet as the clock neared midnight. 

Still, the sound system drew the buzzed and buzzy in from other rooms. Was it the four waist-high subs (“scoops”), each weighing more than 100 pounds, their cabinets painted candy red? Was it the short stack of televisions on top of them, churning static from cassette tapes? Or was it just anticipation?

For the Mile High City’s underground, the Dem Deya Sound System has become symbolic of an ecstatic return that spans techno, house, drum ‘n’ bass, hardcore, dubstep and bass music at large. Its owner and co-creator, 29-year-old Darrien Williamson, has dedicated the last six years to building it and the city’s knowledge of a sound system culture that crosses generations. He has hauled his red, g…

Read more